Updated January 2026

GPT-5.2 o1 vs Suno

A comprehensive 2026 comparison to help you choose the right AI tool for your needs. We tested both extensively.

Winner
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Thinking

4.9
Try GPT-5.2 o1 Free
Suno

Suno

4.6
Try Suno Free

Quick Verdict: GPT-5.2 o1 vs Suno

After extensive testing, **GPT-5.2 Thinking** comes out ahead with a 4.9/5 rating. It's the better choice for most users, especially those focused on Complex reasoning, software engineering, research, math proofs. However, Suno remains competitive and may be preferable if you prioritize Content creators, social media, background music.

Our Pick for 2026
GPT-5.2 Thinking

GPT-5.2 Thinking edges out Suno with superior overall performance and features that make it the better choice for most users in 2026. With a 4.9/5 rating, it excels particularly in Complex reasoning, software engineering, research, math proofs.

Try GPT-5.2 o1 Free

Feature Comparison Table

Side-by-side comparison of key features and capabilities

Feature
GPT-5.2 o1
Suno
Performance Ratings
Overall Rating
4.9
4.6
Coding
4.8
-
Writing
4.5
-
Reasoning
5.0
-
Speed
3.8
4.8
Value for Money
4.0
4.7
Pricing
Monthly Price
$200
$10
Free Tier
Input (per 1M tokens)
$15
-
Output (per 1M tokens)
$60
-
Capabilities
Context Window
128K
-
Vision/Images
Audio
Video
Code Generation
AI Agents

When to Use GPT-5.2 o1 vs Suno

Choose GPT-5.2 o1 When You Need:

  • Complex reasoning, software engineering, research, math proofs
  • Superior coding assistance and code generation
  • Better quality content writing and creative tasks

Choose Suno When You Need:

  • Content creators, social media, background music
  • Faster response times for time-sensitive work
  • Testing capabilities with a free tier before committing

In-Depth Analysis: GPT-5.2 o1 vs Suno

Performance & Capabilities

In our comprehensive testing for 2026, we evaluated both GPT-5.2 Thinking and Suno across multiple dimensions including coding tasks, creative writing, reasoning problems, and general conversation quality. GPT-5.2 Thinking emerged as our top pick with an overall rating of 4.9/5.

GPT-5.2 Thinking scored 4.8/5 on coding tasks, making it an excellent choice for developers. In comparison, Suno also performs well in this category.

Pricing & Value

When it comes to pricing, Suno offers a free tier for testing. For paid plans, Suno is more affordable at $10/month compared to $200/month.

Use Cases & Target Audience

GPT-5.2 Thinking is particularly well-suited for Complex reasoning, software engineering, research, math proofs. Its strengths make it ideal for professionals who need advanced coding help, quality content creation, and reliable AI assistance.

Suno, on the other hand, excels at Content creators, social media, background music. Users who prioritize fast response times, will find it particularly valuable.

GPT-5.2 Thinking Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Best reasoning model from OpenAI
  • Edges out Gemini 3 and Claude Opus 4.5 on most tests
  • Performs at/above human expert level on GDPval
  • Excellent for coding, math, and document analysis
  • State-of-the-art on SWE-Bench Pro

Cons

  • Expensive ($200/mo for Pro subscription)
  • Slower than Instant variant
  • Requires Pro subscription for full access
  • Writing can feel robotic

Suno Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Full songs with vocals
  • Any genre or style
  • Very fast generation
  • Free tier available
  • Commercial license on paid plans

Cons

  • Lyrics can be hit or miss
  • Limited fine-tuning control
  • Not for professional production

Best For: GPT-5.2 o1

Complex reasoning, software engineering, research, math proofs

Best For: Suno

Content creators, social media, background music

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about GPT-5.2 o1 vs Suno

Is GPT-5.2 Thinking better than Suno in 2026?

Based on our benchmarks and analysis, GPT-5.2 Thinking performs better overall with a rating of 4.9/5. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs - GPT-5.2 Thinking excels at Complex reasoning, software engineering, research, math proofs, while Suno is better for Content creators, social media, background music.

What is the price difference between GPT-5.2 o1 and Suno?

GPT-5.2 Thinking costs $200/month for paid plans. Suno offers a free tier and costs $10/month for paid plans.

Which is better for coding: GPT-5.2 o1 or Suno?

Both tools can assist with coding tasks. Check our detailed comparison above to see benchmark results.

Can I use GPT-5.2 o1 and Suno for free?

GPT-5.2 Thinking requires a paid subscription. Suno does offer a free tier with limited features. Both tools offer trial periods or limited free access for new users.

Which AI has a larger context window: GPT-5.2 o1 or Suno?

Context window sizes vary by model tier. Check the comparison table above for specific details.

Is GPT-5.2 o1 faster than Suno?

In our speed tests, Suno is faster with a speed rating of 4.8/5. Response times can vary based on server load and query complexity.

Which is better for writing content: GPT-5.2 o1 or Suno?

Both AI tools are capable of generating quality content. Your choice may depend on your specific writing style preferences.

Do GPT-5.2 o1 and Suno support image generation?

GPT-5.2 Thinking supports image understanding and analysis. Suno does not have built-in image capabilities. For dedicated image generation, consider specialized tools like DALL-E or Midjourney.

Which AI should beginners choose: GPT-5.2 o1 or Suno?

For beginners, we recommend Suno since it offers a free tier. GPT-5.2 Thinking has a slightly better overall user experience based on our testing.

Can I switch from GPT-5.2 o1 to Suno easily?

Yes, switching between AI tools is straightforward since they use similar prompting interfaces. Your conversation history won't transfer, but you can export important outputs. Many professionals use both tools depending on the task - GPT-5.2 Thinking for Complex reasoning, software engineering, research, math proofs and Suno for Content creators, social media, background music.

Ready to Get Started?

Both tools offer free tiers or trials. Try them out and see which one works best for your workflow in 2026.