Opus 4.5 vs Suno

A detailed comparison to help you choose the right AI tool for your needs.

Winner
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5

4.9
Try Opus 4.5
Suno

Suno

4.6
Try Suno
Our Pick
Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5 edges out Suno with superior overall performance and features that make it the better choice for most users.

Try Opus 4.5

Feature Comparison

Feature
Opus 4.5
Suno
Ratings
Overall Rating
4.9
4.6
Coding
5.0
-
Writing
4.8
-
Reasoning
4.9
-
Speed
4.2
4.8
Value
4.5
4.7
Pricing
Monthly Price
$20
$10
Free Tier
Input (per 1M tokens)
$5
-
Output (per 1M tokens)
$25
-
Features
Context Window
200K
-
Vision/Images
Audio
Video
Code Generation
AI Agents

Claude Opus 4.5

Pros

  • Best coding model available (80.9% SWE-bench)
  • Excellent for autonomous agents
  • Effort parameter allows speed/quality tradeoff
  • 76% fewer tokens than Sonnet at same quality
  • Strong at long-horizon tasks

Cons

  • More expensive than Sonnet
  • Slower on simple tasks
  • Requires Claude Pro/Max subscription for full access

Suno

Pros

  • Full songs with vocals
  • Any genre or style
  • Very fast generation
  • Free tier available
  • Commercial license on paid plans

Cons

  • Lyrics can be hit or miss
  • Limited fine-tuning control
  • Not for professional production

Choose Opus 4.5 if you need:

Professional developers, complex codebases, autonomous agents

Choose Suno if you need:

Content creators, social media, background music

Ready to get started?

Both tools offer free tiers or trials. Try them out and see which one works best for your workflow.