Opus 4.5 vs Perplexity

A detailed comparison to help you choose the right AI tool for your needs.

Winner
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5

4.9
Try Opus 4.5
Perplexity AI

Perplexity AI

4.6
Try Perplexity
Our Pick
Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5 edges out Perplexity AI with superior overall performance and features that make it the better choice for most users.

Try Opus 4.5

Feature Comparison

Feature
Opus 4.5
Perplexity
Ratings
Overall Rating
4.9
4.6
Coding
5.0
3.5
Writing
4.8
4.2
Reasoning
4.9
4.4
Speed
4.2
4.8
Value
4.5
4.7
Pricing
Monthly Price
$20
$20
Free Tier
Input (per 1M tokens)
$5
-
Output (per 1M tokens)
$25
-
Features
Context Window
200K
128K
Vision/Images
Audio
Video
Code Generation
AI Agents

Claude Opus 4.5

Pros

  • Best coding model available (80.9% SWE-bench)
  • Excellent for autonomous agents
  • Effort parameter allows speed/quality tradeoff
  • 76% fewer tokens than Sonnet at same quality
  • Strong at long-horizon tasks

Cons

  • More expensive than Sonnet
  • Slower on simple tasks
  • Requires Claude Pro/Max subscription for full access

Perplexity AI

Pros

  • Real-time web access
  • Cites all sources
  • Great for research
  • Fast responses
  • Generous free tier

Cons

  • Not as capable for coding
  • Writing not as polished
  • Limited context for complex tasks

Choose Opus 4.5 if you need:

Professional developers, complex codebases, autonomous agents

Choose Perplexity if you need:

Research, fact-checking, current events

Ready to get started?

Both tools offer free tiers or trials. Try them out and see which one works best for your workflow.