Opus 4.5 vs DALL-E 3

A detailed comparison to help you choose the right AI tool for your needs.

Winner
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5

4.9
Try Opus 4.5
OpenAI

DALL-E 3

4.7
Try DALL-E 3
Our Pick
Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5 edges out DALL-E 3 with superior overall performance and features that make it the better choice for most users.

Try Opus 4.5

Feature Comparison

Feature
Opus 4.5
DALL-E 3
Ratings
Overall Rating
4.9
4.7
Coding
5.0
-
Writing
4.8
-
Reasoning
4.9
-
Speed
4.2
4.3
Value
4.5
4.4
Pricing
Monthly Price
$20
$20
Free Tier
Input (per 1M tokens)
$5
-
Output (per 1M tokens)
$25
-
Features
Context Window
200K
-
Vision/Images
Audio
Video
Code Generation
AI Agents

Claude Opus 4.5

Pros

  • Best coding model available (80.9% SWE-bench)
  • Excellent for autonomous agents
  • Effort parameter allows speed/quality tradeoff
  • 76% fewer tokens than Sonnet at same quality
  • Strong at long-horizon tasks

Cons

  • More expensive than Sonnet
  • Slower on simple tasks
  • Requires Claude Pro/Max subscription for full access

DALL-E 3

Pros

  • Best text rendering in images
  • Integrated into ChatGPT
  • High quality outputs
  • Follows complex prompts well
  • Safety features built-in

Cons

  • No editing/inpainting
  • Requires ChatGPT Plus
  • Limited style control
  • Slower than some alternatives

Choose Opus 4.5 if you need:

Professional developers, complex codebases, autonomous agents

Choose DALL-E 3 if you need:

Marketing images, images with text, integrated chat workflow

Ready to get started?

Both tools offer free tiers or trials. Try them out and see which one works best for your workflow.